
The second game of the 2025-2026 CBA quarterfinals between Shanxi Fenjiu and Zhejiang Guangsheng was not just a back-and-forth battle on the scoreboard, but also a clash of rules, conflicts, and the survival logic of the league. Shanxi, with a 19-34 historical record against Guangsha, had pulled off an upset on the road in Game 1. This put them in a position to win the series, while Guangsha faced elimination.

**Game 2’s Drama: A Duet of Conflict and Grind**
Moving to Shanxi’s home court, the atmosphere was electric from the start. The home team came out aggressive. In the first quarter, Guangsha’s pick-and-roll between Hu Jinqiu and Brown tore through Shanxi’s defense, leaving them down 21-25. By the second quarter, Shanxi’s import Nate went ice-cold, scoring only three points from free throws in 17 minutes, a stark contrast to his previous performance. Guangsha capitalized, stretching the lead to around five points. However, Shanxi’s Diallo kept them in the game with consistent mid-range shots and rebounds, cutting the deficit to 41-46 at halftime.
The turning point came with over six minutes left in the second quarter. Ge Zhaobao, posting up under the basket, got tangled with Hu Jinqiu. As Ge moved to create space, the referee called an offensive foul. Shanxi head coach Pan Jiang immediately erupted, shouting so loudly the entire arena could hear. The referee responded with a technical foul on Pan. This sparked an uproar from Shanxi’s bench, and fans chanted “Black whistle” for two minutes before calm was restored. The intensity of the playoffs is markedly different from the regular season, and with tighter officiating, small incidents can quickly escalate.
Following the call, Shanxi’s offense became hesitant. In the second half, they adjusted their defense by bringing in substitute center Liu Chuanxing. His height and mobility effectively contained Hu Jinqiu in the paint, boosting Shanxi’s defensive intensity and narrowing the gap to just three points by the end of the third quarter.
In the decisive fourth quarter, young player Zhang Ning sparked the crowd by hitting back-to-back three-pointers, cutting the deficit to three. However, poor shot selection in the final minutes allowed Guangsha to seal the game 86-81, thanks to Brown’s free throws and Hu Jinqiu’s rebounds. The series is now tied 1-1, with the deciding game set for May 13 at Guangsha’s home court.
Post-game, Pan Jiang noted that the defense was adequate but the offense lacked decisiveness, especially missing several open looks in the fourth quarter. Diallo led Shanxi with 16 points and 7 rebounds, while Zhang Ning chipped in 13. For Guangsha, Brown recorded 19 points, 5 rebounds, and 5 assists, with Hu Jinqiu adding a double-double of 17 points and 11 boards.
**Harsh Playoff Logic: From Match Point to Decisive Variable**
After losing Game 1, Guangsha studied footage to identify Shanxi’s interior defensive weaknesses. They emphasized the Hu Jinqiu-Brown pick-and-roll in Game 2, which disrupted Shanxi’s defense early. Guangsha head coach Wang Bo, a former player who retired his number with the team and later learned under Li Chunjiang, successfully adapted his tactics—a benefit of having a coach familiar with the roster.
Shanxi’s clear weakness was import Nate’s poor form. After a 20-point outing in Game 1, he managed only 3 points in 17 minutes, effectively removing a key scoring option. Pan Jiang’s comments on offensive indecision highlighted Shanxi’s struggles in critical moments. With Nate underperforming, the team relied heavily on Diallo and Zhang Ning, which proved insufficient.
Playoff intensity led to a higher turnover count—around 15-16 for both teams, more than in the regular season. Liu Chuanxing’s emergence as a bench spark plug in the second half underscored the importance of depth in the postseason.
The series format (best-of-three in the quarterfinals) also played a role. Shanxi, the No. 8 seed, has pushed No. 2 seed Guangsha to the brink, showcasing the CBA’s appeal: upsets are more likely in the playoffs. Under the new foreign player policy (4 quarters, 7 appearances), Nate’s poor showing wasted an import slot, compounding Shanxi’s offensive problems.
The game’s contentious moments also spotlighted on-court etiquette. According to CBA rules, head coaches cannot directly argue with referees; they must communicate through translators or assistants. Pan Jiang’s outburst violated this, resulting in a technical foul.

Registration Log in